Since information changes quickly, and there may be gaps in data received, the Virginia State Police makes no representation, either express or implied, that the information on this site is complete or accurate.Neither the Virginia State Police nor the Commonwealth of Virginia shall be held responsible for any errors or omissions on this web site or produced by secondary dissemination of this information. Extreme care must be taken in the use of information because mistaken identification may occur when relying solely upon name, age and address to identify individuals. If you believe that general information on this site is in error, please submit a comment on the comments page. The information on this web site is made available solely to provide information to the public.If you believe that offender information is in error, please submit a tip by clicking the icon located on the offender? Unlawful use of the information for purposes of intimidating or harassing another is prohibited and willful violation shall be punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.For purposes of this section, absent other aggravating circumstances, the mere republication or reasonable distribution of material contained on or derived for the publicly available Internet sex offender database shall not be deemed intimidation or harassment. By clicking within this box to proceed, I agree to the terms and limitations as stated. B.); a guard displaying nude photographs of himself to a female inmate (Amend. ¶ 20(b)), statements made by a number of female inmates regarding their sexual activities with various non-defendant, male prison personnel. Plaintiff alleges that Zacofsky’s “obsession” with her as well as his willingness to break institutional rules in order to gain access to her was widely known to “each of the individual defendants” (see Amend. Mitchell of Officer Zacofsky ‘having a crush’ on her.” (Amend. ¶ 22.) Plaintiff alleges that Zacofsky’s conduct began immediately after her arrival at the Jail and included physically complimentary or sexual comments and staring (see Amend. ¶¶ 30, 43, 47-51) and, on one alleged occasion on September 20, 2007, forcible kissing and fondling. ¶ 20(a)-(f).) Primarily, however, Plaintiff’s allegations relate to the repeated sexual abuse suffered at the hands of Zackofsky. The Defendants, as well as numerous other corrections officers “made light to Ms. ¶ 34.) Plaintiff alleges that this conduct was “common knowledge” amongst inmates and correctional personnel including Defendants. Virginia law does not allow offenses other than the crimes for which the convicted sex offender is required to register to be disclosed here. Information pertaining to schools, parks and street map data is obtained with permission of and through a license agreement with Service Objects.Other information on this web site is compiled from reports from law enforcement agencies and correctional facilities.
))cv1052 (JCC) RAPPAHANNOCKREGIONAL JAIL ) AUTHORITY, et. ) M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss Count II (Violation of the Eight Amendment) and Count IV (Gross Negligence) jointly filed by Defendants Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority (which has since withdrawn its Motion; see Dkt. 5.) For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, this Court will use the term “Defendants” to mean only these defendants who have maintained the Motions to dismiss that are presently the before Court (i.e. Plaintiff’s voluminous Amended Complaint contains one hundred and forty-one paragraphs of detailed factual allegations of widely-known and widespread illegal sexual activity between male guards and female prisoners as well the sexual harassment of the prisoners by the guards. Code § 18.2-64.2 for a guard to have “carnal knowledge of an inmate” there was a pervasive double standard in the “sexual culture” of the Jail allowing male guards to have forced/abusive or “consensual” sexual relationships with female prisoners, while, sexual activity between male prisoners an correctional personal was forbidden. There are thousands of active singles on Date looking to chat right now.Free Fredericksburg chat, latest topics discussed: When did I join DH?The TIPS Calendar is not intended to give detailed information on an event.Individuals must contact the sponsor for details and registration.With my Connection, the profile you create allows you to set up a unique starting point for the tasks and transactions that you want to complete in your time on this website.Use my Connection to gather the information that you most care about from across this website into one central location, giving you greater control over how you connect with your community.Offenses which require registration can be found at Statutes General Comments regarding this website can be submitted at the following location: Comments Information regarding a particular offender can be submitted through the Tips icon located on each offender's webpage.There's a better way to personalize your website experience.For the following reasons, the Court will deny Defendants Motions to Dismiss Counts II and IV. Background The factual allegations relevant to these Mtions to Dismiss are as follows. ¶ 27.) The jail houses approximately 1,000 inmates and employs approximately 150 correctional officers. On or about August 30, 2007, Plaintiff entered the custody of the Department of Corrections and was sent to the Rappahannock Regional Jail (“Jail”) where she was to serve her sentence of a mandatory minimum of three years plus ninety days imprisonment.